Not affiliated with Crisp. Scores are opinion based on public data.
0/100
crisp.chat
Crisp
🟡 Hard ModeMedium confidence
Medium confidence
62/100 stealabilityNext.js
Key findings
- → Bundled static kit for crisp.chat
Vulnerability Analysis
- 1.Crisp likely charges more than a focused alternative needs to
- 2.Their feature set is broad — a niche player can do one thing better
- 3.Modern AI-assisted development closes the build gap fast
- 4.Public signals don't show a strong lock-in mechanism
You Can Reproduce
- ✓ Landing page and pricing page layout (clone Crisp's positioning)
- ✓ User auth and basic dashboard shell
- ✓ Core CRUD workflow with Supabase
Don't Underestimate
- ! Crisp's distribution and brand trust
- ! Enterprise features and compliance if they have them
- ! Network effects or proprietary data they accumulated
SMB segment
Smaller teams priced out of enterprise tiers
API-first
Developers want programmatic access they don't offer
Risk Matrix
IP RiskLow
No obvious patents detected from public data
RegulatoryLow
Standard SaaS compliance applies
IncumbentMedium
Crisp has brand recognition
Pro unlocks deeper intel
Source coverage, raw signals, and JSON export — join the waitlist below.
- ████████ ████ ████████Domain history — Pro only
- ████████ ████ ████████Open source activity — Pro only
- ████████ ████ ████████Web presence — Pro only
- ████████ ████ ████████Review sites — Pro only
StealThisSaaS Pro
Pro — deeper intel + API. Join waitlist. Still free to analyze.
- Source coverage breakdown (which signals returned data)
- Full analysis export (JSON)
- API access for bulk / automated research
Pro waitlist
Deeper intel + API — coming soon.